Thursday, 21 November 2013

Life affirming


My argument is as follows: atheism seeks the truth, which is in one perspective admirable and combats faith (the latter represented in Judeo Christian or modern religion) with evidence. But in my opinion it is a petty ‘ego’ battle – evidence v faith. What benefit does this have on human-outlook- morality? To implicitly outline that we are merely animals and implicitly outline that there is no meaning in life –devoid of god (which is however ‘true’)- ‘truth’ can however thus ensue nihilism. Simply, atheists create a ‘void’ which needs filling. This is where I sound like I’m imitating and admiring Nietzsche- because the ‘death of god’ (i.e the lack of evidence for religion and the fact that scientific evidence/ developments since around the 19th century undermines God’s existence) gives us the chance to do away with the Judeo/modern religions and create or value a ‘life affirming’ religion, or set of values such as paganism/odalism (soil and blood) – in opposition to the inherent nihilism of the atheists and the ‘otherworldliness’ of the Judeo/mod religions.